For corporate and transactional teams
LawAOS connects parties, scope, diligence, workstreams, documents, approvals, signatures, time, invoices, client delivery, and governed AI to the same transaction record.corporate legal softwaretransaction management for law firmsM&A matter managementlegal deal workflow software
One working system
Every capability below works from the same firm-scoped records, roles, matters, clients, and audit context.
Transaction command
Keep parties, advisors, scope, milestones, responsibilities, files, decisions, and commercial context on one matter.
Visible deal progression
Run diligence, drafting, negotiation, approvals, conditions, and closing through accountable workstreams.
Document lifecycle
Draft, review, version, compare, approve, sign, and preserve transaction documents without losing their matter context.
Conflicts and access
Screen parties early and restrict sensitive mandates through firm roles, matter access, and ethical walls.
Commercial control
Connect time, disbursements, budgets, invoices, payment, and matter reporting to the work that created them.
Governed transaction AI
Use named agents for extraction, issue spotting, drafting, comparison, and closing support inside approved access and review rules.
A complete engagement
Open the mandate once
Capture the parties, instruction, conflicts result, scope, team, commercial terms, and initial document set in one record.
Move the transaction visibly
Coordinate diligence, drafting, negotiation, approvals, client decisions, and agent-supported work through shared stages.
Close and preserve the record
Execute documents, complete conditions, issue the invoice, share the closing set, and retain obligations for follow-up.
Questions before you move
Yes. The same matter model supports recurring corporate advisory, governance, filings, contract work, and staged transactions without forcing every instruction into one workflow.
No. External access is deliberate. The firm chooses which documents, messages, signatures, invoices, and updates a client or invited participant can reach.
No. Agent output remains reviewable legal work. Firm and matter permissions constrain context, and lawyers remain responsible for professional judgment and final work product.