Lawyers use AI to summarize and question documents, draft first versions, review contracts against a standard, extract dates and fields, and handle routine record-keeping such as logging time or creating tasks. The output is a draft: a lawyer reviews it before anyone relies on it.
In LawAOS the assistant works on the firm's own records within the signed-in user's permissions. It answers questions from the firm's documents with citations, reviews contracts against a firm playbook, reviews invoice narratives before billing, extracts deadlines from documents, and can create documents, tasks, time entries, invoices, calendar events and docket entries.
LawAOS has no case-law or statute database and no web search. For legal research it relies on the model's own knowledge, so every authority it names must be checked against a primary source.
- Treat the answer as a starting point, not an authority.
- Look up every case, statute or rule it names in a primary source before citing it.
- Prefer questions about your own documents, where answers cite the passage they came from.
- Keep client names out of tools the firm has not approved.
- Record who reviewed the output, as you would for a junior's draft.
For firms looking at AI-powered legal billing, the useful jobs are narrow and checkable. LawAOS reviews invoice narratives before billing, and dismissing a finding needs a typed reason. It suggests time entries from calendar events, which a person accepts one by one. It drafts a reminder for an overdue invoice that a person sends, and estimates proposal fees from the firm's comparable closed matters.
Each plan includes a monthly allowance of AI actions; top-up packs are sold separately and a firm may bring its own provider key at any time. Provider availability, fair-use, rate and abuse controls apply. Solo includes 200 AI actions per user a month; Practice includes 2,000 AI actions a month, pooled across the firm; Firm includes AI actions with no counted ceiling, under fair use.
Only completed assistant actions count. Providers include Anthropic, OpenAI, OpenRouter, Google, Mistral, xAI, DeepSeek and Groq. A firm that brings its own provider key stores it encrypted, and use under that key is not metered against the allowance. Firm data is not used to train LawAOS models.
Ask about your documents
Ask a question and get an answer grounded in the firm's documents, with citations to the source.
See the moduleReview a contract
Run contract review against the firm's playbook and check each finding.
See the moduleLet the assistant act
Ask it to create a task, log time, add a docket entry or run a conflict check; it acts only where you have permission.
See the moduleCheck billing before it goes out
Run invoice narrative review and accept or dismiss each finding with a reason.
See the module
Stated plainly, so you can decide before you sign up rather than after.
- There is no case-law or statute database and no web search; research answers come from model knowledge and must be verified.
- AI output must be reviewed by a lawyer before anyone relies on it.
- AI actions are metered against the plan's allowance unless the firm uses its own provider key; at the limit the assistant stops until a top-up pack is bought.
Anything the list leaves open, our team answers directly.